My New DSLR: Side by Side Comparison

Jennifer Wilson

I’m your guide here at Simple Scrapper. Our community helps people find what fills you up and fits your life in memory keeping.

August 6, 2009

Ever since the new camera arrived on my doorstep, I’ve wanted to compare the images with those of my previous camera. Without proper planning however, those side by side comparions shots never seemed to materialize – until my recent vacation.

One (or my husband) might say that I tend to hog the camera – so he brought along our FujiFilm S5000 to snap right next to me. And what better way to compare 3 MP and 12 MP than with images of America’s iconic Mount Rushmore. This post will be the first in a series, I hope. I am particularly keen on seeing how different lenses and my old camera compare in low light conditions!

For comparison purposes, I cropped my photo so that nearly the same image filled the frame and saved as a maximum resolution jpeg. No editing has been done to either photo. Without enlarging, can you tell the difference?

Photo A
oldcamera-1

Photo B
newcamera1-lessthan7mb

At this size, the differences are small – primarily in the white balance. But let’s take a look at a zoom to 200%:

Photo A
oldcamera-1-zoom

Photo B
newcamera1-zoom

In Photo A, taken my with older camera there is noticeable noise at 200% zoom. Photo B is very crisp. While these results are not surprising in the least, they do illustrate the upgrade in quality between the two cameras. However, it cannot be certain whether any of the additional quality is due to the type of camera or solely due to resolution (megapixels).

This wasn’t a scientific study – just an illustration – but there are important lessons to learn if you plan on printing your photos or your layouts.

You May Also Like…

My Lightroom Process

My Lightroom Process

I’m sharing my simple workflow for Adobe Lightroom that combines the convenience of my phone and the power of my computer.

My Obsession

My Obsession

I’ve been managing my photos with Adobe Lightroom for a long time. In this video I explain why I love this software is an essential part of my creative process.

1 Comment

  1. Stan

    Jennifer,

    I’ll weigh in with a few observations:

    I can think of two reasons for the big jump in quality. No doubt the 3MP to the 12MP is a factor, however , a bigger factor is the sensor density ( how many pixels packed onto how big a chip) The Fuji has 3 million pixels on a tiny 5.27 x 3.96 mm chip for a density of 15 MP/cm² while your Canon gets it 12 million pixels on a huge 22.2 x 14.8 mm for a density of only 3.7 MP/cm². Less pixel per cm = way better quality, especially in low light and at higher zooms

    The other factor is the lens. Canon has long experience making lenses (and cameras) while Fuji is primarily a film company. The design of a lens to resolve detail on that smaller Fuji chip will incorporate trade-offs that Canon on the bigger chip doesn’t have to make.

    Born out of experience, I’ll leave you and your readers with this. Megapixels don’t rule. A 12MP point-and-shoot will never give you the same quality as a 12MP DSLR. Actually we’ve seen at the lab 12MP P&S give the equivalent of a 6MP DSLR – all due to that chip size. So when upgrading keep that in mind – a lower megapixel DSLR might just get you better pictures than that super high megapixel point-and-shoot.

    Sorry so long!

    Stan at Scrappers Workshop

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.